Ying Nan: You are a product of all who came before you. The legacy of your family, the good and the bad, it is all a part of who you are.
Shang-chi (2021)
My kids and I have been watching the Marvel MCU movies for years. My firstborn is particularly a Marvel fan since she was a little girl. Some of the movies are better than others (my personal favorite is Thor: Ragnarok),1 but we both really like the movie Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings.
When my wife (who is Japanese) and I first dated, there was an immediate clash of cultures. I was a generic American white kid who grew up in an impoverished broken home with lots of issues, my wife grew up in a working-class Japanese family that was not overly traditional, but still very Japanese compared to American standards. The fact we were dating in the first place was a bit awkward for her and her parents, whereas I hardly ever talked to my own parents.
The good news is that over time, we learned to understand one another, and that means that I too learned to appreciate her viewpoint sometimes. For example, family.
Even when she disagreed with her parents, she still respected them, and understood her family obligations. This was something frankly new to me because I openly rebelled against my parents, told my dad off, and hardly paid them any heed. I gradually did reconcile with my parents to some degree as I got older (and a bit wiser), to a level where we can get along, but more importantly I learned to accept that I am who I am due to my family. Like the quote above says, you can’t deny your own heritage, both the good and the bad, and that it does shape who you are.
But also, through my wife and through parenting myself, I learned that I do owe some level of gratitude to my parents for what they did. I chose not to be like my parents in how I raise my kids, but even that is something I learned from them.2 Thus, the lesson I learned from my wife is that I also have to be humble, and respectful to my parents enough to acknowledge what they’ve done for me, even if I disagree with them. This is a very Confucian outlook, but I can see the value in this.3
It rubs against my American sense of individualism, but I’ve found it a valuable lesson over the years, and something I think we can all learn from.
P.S. Xu Wenwu, the father in Shang-chi, is a great example of a plausible chaotic-evil person in Dungeons and Dragons: he craves absolute power and yet is also capable of being in love, being a father, etc. Yet, he inevitably bends everything toward evil or ruin, including his lawful-good wife, Ying Li. Tony Leung Chiu-wai‘s performance was excellent.
1 The Thor movies do a really nice job of weaving science fiction with magic and myth, much like Roger Zelazny did in his books generations ago (Lord of Light, the Amber Series, Creatures of Light and Darkness, etc.). Put simply, I like weird, transcendent stuff more than the “grounded” story lines like Captain America or Black Widow.
2 In Japanese there is a four-character phrase for this: hanmen kyōshi (反面教師) meaning to learn from a bad example (i.e. what not to do).
3 This importance in family isn’t even limited to Confucian-influenced cultures. You can find it in many unrelated world cultures where family is emphasized, and respect towards one’s ancestors. For whatever reason, it is not emphasized in Western culture, and maybe to our detriment I think.
Another interesting quote from a 13th century Japanese Zen text, the Zuimonki (first described here), about the importance of not engaging in debates with others.
1-10) In a dharma talk, Dōgen said,
Even if you are speaking rationally and another person says something unreasonable, it is wrong to defeat him by arguing logically. On the other hand, it is not good to give up hastily saying that you are wrong, even though you think that your opinion is reasonable.
Neither defeats him, nor withdraw saying you are wrong. It is best to just leave the matter alone and stop arguing. If you act as if you have not heard and forget about the matter, he will forget too and will not get angry. This is a very important thing to bear in mind.
I think there’s only so much one can do to convince others, and if you meet someone who’s already made up their mind, it’s very unlikely you can change it because one’s beliefs are part of their core identity.
Spock: “Humans do have an amazing capacity for believing what they choose and excluding that which is painful.”
Star Trek, “And The Children Shall Lead” (s3ep4), stardate 5029.5
At that point, any effort to convince them is a sunk cost, a waste of energy.
So, like Dogen says, better to just drop the subject and let it go.
Shinran (親鸞, 1173 – 1263), founder of the Jodo Shinshu sect in Japan, was a prolific writer. His largest work by far as the voluminous text, the Kyogyoshinsho (教行信証, “The True Teaching, Practice, and Realization of the Pure Land Way“), but Shinran also wrote a number of lesser-known text and commentaries, including the Notes on Essentials of Faith Alone (yuishinshō-mon’i, 唯信鈔文意).
Shinran’s writing style is a bit challenging, even with translations,
because Shinran tended to use subtle turns of phrase that would be lost on readers today. Sort of like a certain Buddhist blogger you might know.
or to make use quotations within quotations…
But I digress. 😋
In the Notes, which are commentaries on an older text written by Genshin, Shinran quotes a certain Chinese Pure Land teacher named Fa-zhao1 as follows:
That Buddha [Amida], in the causal stage, made the universal Vow:
When beings hear my Name and think on me, I will come to welcome each of them,not discriminating at all between the poor and the rich andwellborn, not discriminating between inferior and the highly gifted, not choosing the learned and those upholding pure precepts, nor rejecting those who break precepts and whose evil karma isprofound.
Solely making beings turn about and abundantly say the nembutsu,I can make bits of rubble change into gold.
The most important phrase here, and one that Dr Taitetsu Unno liberally referred to in his books, is “turning bits of rubble into gold”.
This notion of transformation gets to the very heart of the Buddhist path. It is not limited to Pure Land Buddhism, but speaks to the potential of all beings toward transformation if given the right conditions and training. Or, alternatively, through the compassion of Amida Buddha. If you look at the 48 vows of Amida Buddha, by the way, in the Sutra on the Buddha of Immeasurable Life, there is this vow:
(3) If, when I attain Buddhahood, humans and devas in my land should not all be the color of pure gold, may I not attain perfect Enlightenment.
Or, the Buddha’s simile of refining gold in the Pali Canon: the Paṁsudhovaka Sutta (AN 3.102):
“There are these gross impurities in gold: dirty sand, gravel, & grit. The dirt-washer or his apprentice, having placed (the gold) in a vat, washes it again & again until he has washed them away.
“When he is rid of them, there remain the moderate impurities in the gold: coarse sand & fine grit. He washes the gold again & again until he has washed them away.
In both sutras, we see that gold was used to symbolize the purity of one’s inner character. Regardless of one’s impurities, one’s inner character and potential for awakening can shine forth if purified. What makes Fa-zhao’s comment even more extraordinary is the symbolism of little bits of rubble becoming gold, not just a large nuggets.
He describes the compassion of Amida Buddha toward all beings, and his non-discrimination toward them, and how Amida’s compassion extends to all equally, transforms all equally, each according to their background and inspires them to recite the nembutsu out of sheer magnetism.
It’s easy to see why Shinran was inspired by this passage.
I found a neat quote recently from an old Soto Zen text called the Shōbōgenzō Zuimonki (正法眼蔵隨聞記), or “The Treasury of the True Dharma Eye: [A] Record of Things Heard”. We will call it the Zuimonki for short. Dōgen, who brought Soto Zen from China to Japan in the 13th century wrote a massive tome called the Shōbōgenzō, but his chief disciple Koun Ejō (孤雲懐奘, 1198–1280) also recorded the Zuimonki in the 13th. Ejo was actually a few years older than Dogen, yet outlived him by 20+ years or so. He would become the second abbot of Eiheiji temple, and its spiritual successor after Dogen’s passing.
The Zuimonki occupies a similar space as the Tannisho in the Jodo Shinshu tradition: a record of informal conversations between the founder and a trusted disciple. You can find a nice translation of it here on the Soto Zen homepage.1
Near the very end is the following conversation that I wanted to share (emphasis added):
[6-16]. Dōgen instructed,
All the buddhas and patriarchs were originally ordinary people.
While they were ordinary people, they certainly did bad deeds and had evil minds. Some of them were undoubtedly dull or even stupid. However, since they reformed their minds, followed their teachers, and practiced (the Way), they all became buddhas and patriarchs. People today should also be like this. Do not underestimate yourselves because you think you are dull or stupid.
If you do not arouse bodhi-mind in this present lifetime, when can you expect to be able to practice the Way? If you force yourselves to practice now, you will surely attain the Way.
There’s a lot to unpack in this quote, all of it good I think.
First, Dogen reiterates that the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas of the Buddhist tradition were all normal sentient beings at some point, with foibles, bad habits, etc. However, they resolved to change, and in time they became something much more. We saw this in the second chapter of the Shushogi as well, so we can definitely infer that Dogen sincerely believed that everyone could accomplish the Buddhist path if they only applied themselves.
I grew up in a broken home as a kid, with two younger sisters, and a chaotic family environment, and needlessly to say I did poorly in school. I remember year after year my teachers would tell my mom that if I just applied myself, I’d do really well. Finally, in the 10th grade, after reading a copy of J.R.R. Tolkien’s Fellowship of the Ring, I discovered that I really liked reading, and soon my grades improved enough that I could get into the local University and live the life I do now. So, I can attest that “believing in yourself, and applying yourself” really is true.
Second, Dogen is clearly not concerned about Dharma Decline, which was the milieu at the time in medieval Japanese Buddhism. Most sects in Japan had felt that because of the increasing chaos and declining Buddhist institutions, which roughly lined up with some aspects of Buddhist chronology,2 traditional Buddhist practice could no longer provide solutions to people’s suffering, hence alternative solutions arose. However, looking back from the 21st century, 8 centuries later, this may seem silly now. Yet, it was an intensely discussed subject at the time. Presumably, since Dogen had journeyed to China unlike other eminent monks at the time, he saw things from a different perspective and wasn’t convinced that the End Times were nigh.
Finally, Dogen is telling listeners not to lose faith in themselves. Self-doubt for anyone is crippling, but Dogen says even if you think you are slob, or an idiot, or whatever, don’t underestimate yourself.
From the original “Lego Movie”.
But if you’re unsure, start small, know your limits, but don’t give up either. Keep your eyes on the prize. 💪🏼
1 English resources on the Soto Zen website are actually quite good, and if you can read the Japanese pages, they are even better.
2 … using some pretty liberal interpretations of certain old Buddhist texts, and some calculations of the Buddha’s historical birth that no longer are accurate thanks to modern archaeology and research.
As this weekend approaches, I was looking up some quotes from past writers in antiquity looking for inspiration, and I finally settled on this one.
Sometimes life feels pretty terrible, and hopeless. But I like how this quote from the ancient Taoist text, the Dao De Jing (Tao Te Ching in some spellings), reminds us that even a powerful hurricane doesn’t blowforever.
At difficult times, I like reading this old post. Not to sound vain, but it is my personal favorite.
I’ve been sitting on this post for a little while, trying to decide how best to put things into words. I don’t like delving into contemporary issues, or politics. But it’s hard to ignore the many problems going on right now.
In particular, I keep thinking about the above quote, and the related Ship of Theseus for us Westerners. Even in peaceful times, it’s hard not to look back and see how things have changed, and won’t go back to the way things were before. Even more so in dramatic times.
But this year, I feel we’ve definitely crossed some kind of threshold, not just in a nostalgic sense.
Even after the Roman general Sulla retired in 78 BCE as dictator, the Roman Republic didn’t carry on as it did before. Instead, rapid decline continued as other men such as Cicero, Pompey, Caesar, and Augustus seized on the precedent to push their own vision of rulership. If one powerful man can break precedent, then what’s to stop others from doing the same?
Of course, this decline of the Republic1 had other precedents too. Bit by bit, across generations, things changed and the effects weren’t always clear until too late. Sulla opposed the populist, reformist Gracchi brothers, and the Gracchi Brothers in turn were opposed to increased centralization of land-wealth, which in turn had been caused by Rome’s increasing power and influence across the Italian Peninsula, etc, etc. Where one issue begins and another ends is hard to fathom. Instead, bit by bit, like the wooden planks on the Ship of Theseus, small changes gradually add up until something is no longer recognizable.
If we look at other societies, such as the fall of Heian Period aristocracy in 12th century Japan, it is the same thing: small changesbuiltup, followed by a dramatic shift in power, and then the aristocracy was then permanently diminished in power, replaced by military governments. Once the threshold was crossed, it was never the same, and that’s why the author of the Hojoki wrote what he did.
“How did you go bankrupt?” “Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.”
Ernest Hemingway, The Sun Also Rises
Thus, here I sit, an armchair philosopher watching everything I took for granted in my youth change around me, often abruptly, until it’s no longer recognizable. I don’t know how things will resolve, though somehow they will. Yet, countless changes that will only make sense in hindsight have led to this moment in history that I am forced to live in, and I have to accept that in a sense it’s already over.
1 Technically speaking, the Republic (a.k.a. res publica in Latin, or politeia in Greek) never ended until 1453 with the fall of Constantinople. The way that modern historians define a republic is different than how Romans thought of it. The imperial era from Augustus onward was still seen as the res publica/politeia, it just gradually changed and evolved … like the Ship of Theseus … from one system of administration or another. But Romans never really viewed a “break” between the senatorial style of government and the later imperial one as a change in historical period.
I’ve always been fascinated when Zen and Pure Land teachings overlap, and recently I was poking around the Internet looking at some websites related to the Obaku sect of Japanese Zen. I’ve mentioned this sect before in the context of its most famous monk Tetsugen (older post here).
Ōbaku Zen (黄檗宗, ōbaku-shū) is a lesser-known sect of Zen in Japan because it arrived much later (17th century) from the Chinese mainland than Rinzai and Soto Zen (13th century) did. Obaku Zen and Rinzai actually have the same source lineage in China, but by the Ming Dynasty in China (when Obaku came to Japan), the Buddhist culture there had largely reconciled Pure Land and Zen thinking and so Obaku contains a lot of Pure Land influences not found in Rinzai, though in all other respects they are basically the same.1 They even share a homepage together.
The quote above comes from a youth periodical for Obaku Zen monks, and I have read similar teachings before from Zen sources. I even quoted the same website in a past post, but after recent events, for some reason this makes a lot more sense than it used to.
If you look at the Hymn of Zazen by Hakuin (a Rinzai monk), he teaches something similar: people are inclined to look for the truth elsewhere, but it’s right under our noses. The last verse of the Hymn even says explicitly:
当所即ち蓮華国此身即ち仏なり Tōsho sunawachi rengekoku, kono mi sunawachi hotoke nari
This very place is the Lotus Land, this very body the Buddha.
translation by Robert Aitken Roshi
The only difference between these two quotes is that Obaku Zen uses the imagery of the Pure Land of Amida Buddha, while Hakuin uses the Pure Land of Shakyamuni Buddha from chapter sixteen of the Lotus Sutra. But as we saw in the Shushogirecently,2 one Buddha’s the same as another. You can call it what you want, the teaching is the same.
It’s easy to understand all this on an intellectual level, but to really “get it”, can take a lifetime or many lifetimes. Or, perhaps I am just thick-headed. 😅
In any case, twenty years as a Buddhist, and yet the Dharma never ceases to surprise me…
Namu Shakamuni Butsu Namu Amida Butsu
P.S. Translating the Japanese-Buddhist term 唯心 (yuishin) is tricky. This is actually the term “Consciousness Only” as in the Chinese-Buddhist term for the Yogacara school of Buddhism, wherein there is no reality outside of one’s own consciousness (mind). But that’s hard to write in full, so I translated, perhaps clumsily, as this mind (as in one’s own mind, one’s own perception).
1 It’s tempting to think that Rinzai is a more “pure” form of Zen, or that conversely Obaku is a more “polished” version than Rinzai. I leave that to people’s own interpretations. I used to assume that older sects equaled more pristine teachings, but these days I am not so sure.
2 Other sources include the “Parable of the Magic City” in the Lotus Sutra, and the opening paragraphs of the Sutra of the Buddha of Immeasurable Life among other places. Although Mahayana Buddhism isn’t alwys internally consistent, there are certain overarching themes throughout its history and they show up in unexpected places.
Today we explore the final chapter of the 19th-century Soto Zen text called the Shushōgi (修証義, “Meaning of Practice and Verification”), which I introduced here. Chapter five delves into the importance of gratitude in Buddhist practice. You can read chapter four here.
The Buddha mind should be awakened in all sentient beings on this earth through causal relations. Their desire to be born in this world is fulfilled. Why shouldn’t they be grateful to see the Sakyamuni Buddha?
Translation by Soto Zen Text Project of Stanford University, courtesy of Sotozen.net.
Again, reiterating what chapter four said: awakening the Bodhi Mind (a.k.a. the Buddha Mind, etc) is an important part of Mahayana Buddhism.
If the Right Law had not permeated the world, we could not have met it even if we wanted to sacrifice our lives for it. We should quietly reflect on this fact. How fortunate to have been born at this moment when we can meet the Right Law. Remember that the Buddha said: “When you meet a Zen master who teaches the highest wisdom, don’t consider his caste. Don’t pay attention to his appearance, consider his shortcomings, or criticize his practices. In deference to his wisdom, just bow before him and do nothing to worry him.”
The “right law” is a reference to the Dharma of the Buddha. The Dharma always exists, but at times it is obscured, and needs a Buddha to help elucidate it. This is known as “turning the wheel of the Dharma” in Buddhism. Eventually that wheel slows down, another Buddha appears, turns the wheel, repeat cycle.
I am not sure where Dogen is quoting the “when you meet a Zen teacher…” from. I believe the point here is that regardless of who that teacher is, if they are indeed wise, then they are worthy of respect.
Of course, there’s also been plenty of scandals with priests and gurus who abuse their students especially when there’s such a dearth of teachers in the West, with little oversight from faraway parent organizations. So, I hate to say it, but also caveat emptor.
That’s why, personally, I prefer relying less on such teachers and focus on things like devotion, personal conduct, and DIY. In other words, things that don’t require total reliance on a teacher.1 Once these things are established, then it makes sense to reach out and find teachers and communities when you are ready. But, that’s just my opinion.
Anyway, I digress.
We can see the Buddha now and listen to his teachings because of the altruistic Buddhas and patriarchs did not transmit the Law truly, how could it have come down to us today? We should appreciate even a phrase or portion of the Law. How can we help but be thankful for the great compassion of the highest law — the Eye and Treasury of the Right Law? The sick sparrow did not forget the kindness received and returned it with the ring of the three great ministers. Nor did the troubled tortoise forget: it showed its gratitude with the seal of Yofu.2 So if even beasts return thanks, how can man do otherwise?
As we saw in chapter one, the rarity of being reborn as a human, let alone encountering the Dharma is remarkable indeed. In chapter two of the Lotus Sutra there is a verse that reads: If persons with confused and distracted minds should enter a memorial tower and once exclaim, “Hail to the Buddha!” Then all have attained the Buddha way.
Thus, even if one feels like they’re not a particularly good Buddhist, the Lotus Sutra provides hope that even a tiny act here and there still guarantees full one’s progress on the Buddhist path. So, don’t lose heart. Even if you are a half-assed Buddhist (pardon my language), every bit still counts.
To show this gratitude you need no other teachings. Show it in the only real way — by daily practice. Without wasting time we should spend our daily life in selfless activity.
Amen. This isn’t just Dogen’s words by the way. The Pali Canon also teaches a similar message: praise is all well and good, but putting the teachings into practice is an even better way to express gratitude. The trick is learning how to do it in a balanced, sustainable (read: realistic) way. Slow and steady wins the race.
Time flies with more speed than an arrow; life moves on, more transient than dew. By what skillful means can you reinstate a day that has passed. To live one hundred years wastefully is to regret each day and month. Your body becomes filled with sorrow. Although you wander as the servant of the senses during the days and months of a hundred years — if you truly live one day, you not only live a life of a hundred years but save the hundred years of your future life. The life of this one day is the vital life. Your body becomes significant. This life and body deserve love and respect, for through them we can practice the Law and express the power of the Buddha. So true practice of the Law for one day is the seed of all the Buddha and their activities.
Again, as the Lotus Sutra says, even a little practice and conduct goes a long way, even if you can’t see it. Do not sell yourself short. As a thinking, capable human there is much you can do with the time you have.
All the Buddhas are Buddha Sakyamuni himself. Buddhas past, present, and future become the Buddha Sakyamuni on attaining Buddhahood. This mind itself is the Buddha. By awakening to a thorough understanding of this mind, you will truly show your gratitude to the Buddhas.
The phrase “all the Buddhas are Buddha Shakyamuni himself” is, I think, another allusion to the Lotus Sutra. In the Lotus Sutra, Shakyamuni Buddha teaches (in chapter two?) that every Buddha has the same qualities, and also use the same teaching methods to awaken and enlighten others. A similar sentiment is expressed in a Pure Land sutra called the Sutra of Immeasurable Life. In other words, it’s a common theme in Mahayana Buddhism that one Buddha is as good as another, and all have the same qualities.
The “mind is Buddha” comment is a very Zen statement, and I believe it relates to how the mind is a mirror reflecting what it perceives back onto the world (filtered by the mind). Thus an awakened mind sees all as Buddha. I can’t say I know exactly what this means. I am a newbie myself. 😅
Anyhow, that’s the Shushōgi. For a text that summarizes a much larger and more difficult text in the Soto Zen tradition (Dogen’s Shobogenzo), I think it does a nice job of covering essential points with a coherent theme that is pretty accessible for lay followers. It gets frowned upon by certain Western audiences because meditation is not covered, but I think it’s a great introduction for working-class lay people to the Buddhist path, and provides a foundation that new students to Buddhism can build on through meditation, study, etc. I can see why it has become part of Soto Zen liturgy in Japan.
Further, if you look at other Buddhist traditions in mainland Asia, they will almost certainly teach a similar approach, so Dogen’s teachings, and they way they are expressed in the Shushogi, are very mainstream Mahayana Buddhism in my opinion. Thus, even if you aren’t into Zen, it’s still a perfectly good primer.
Anyhow, if you made it this far, thanks for reading! The Shushogi was a lot of fun to explore, and I personally learned a lot.
P.S. If you want to see how this final chapter is recited traditionally, please enjoy this video:
P.P.S. For those in the US, happy Memorial Day weekend!
1 This is also why I have spent so long following the Pure Land Buddhist path: portable, accessible, and less reliance on gurus and teachers.
2 I spent hours trying to figure out what this alluded to, but with a bit of determination and luck (and some Google translate 😅 of Chinese Wikipedia), I got my answer.
In a Chinese-historical text called the Book of Jin, there is a story about a man named Kong Yu (孔愉, 268 — 342), courtesy name Jing-Kang (敬康). Kong Yu (Japanese pronunciation Kōyu) once was walking through a region called Yubuting, when he saw a turtle being sold at a roadside market for food. Kong Yu bought the turtle and set it free so that it would not be eaten. The turtle turned left and went to the river. Later, when Kong Yu was appointed governor of Yubuting, he was granted an official seal in the shape of a turtle, which mysteriously faced left. Kong Yu realized that this seal of governance was somehow repayment by the turtle for his kindness. In Japanese the seal is called yofutei (余不亭), and the story is called kyūkame yofuin (窮亀余不印, “Seal of the Distressed Turtle”).
Today we explore the fourth chapter of five of the 19th-century Soto Zen text called the Shushōgi (修証義, “Meaning of Practice and Verification”), which I introduced here. Chapter four delves into the importance of helping others as a fundamental Buddhist practice. You can read chapter three here.
And now, onwards dear readers…
Awakening the wisdom mind means vowing to save all beings before we ourselves have crossed to the other shore. Everyone — whether layman, priest, deva, or man — whether enjoying pleasure or suffering pain — should quickly awaken this vow.
Translation by Soto Zen Text Project of Stanford University, courtesy of Sotozen.net.
This “vow” is a concept in Mahayana Buddhism called the “Bodhi Mind”: the aspiration for Enlightenment no matter how long it takes, but also help liberate others along the way. The Four Bodhisattva Vows recited in Buddhist services encapsulate this sentiment.
Lord of the Rings meme I found online recently. Denethor was a terrible dad. 🤣
Much like the precepts, it’s not something you master immediately, but if you choose to recite the vows, it may provide a beacon for yourself (and others) in difficult times.
Though humble in appearance, anyone who has awakened this vow is already the teacher of mankind. Even a girl of seven may be the teacher of the four classes of Buddhists and the compassionate mother of all beings. This emphasis on the equality of the sexes represents one of the finest teachings of Buddhism.
The “girl of seven” alluded to here, is actually a reference to the Dragon Princess (竜女, ryūnyo) in the twelfth chapter of the Lotus Sutra. Her miraculous progress along the Buddhist path to full Enlightenment, in spite of her being…
a girl in a patriarchal society,
a child, and
non-human
… was meant to blow the minds of the establishment and show how literally anyone can achieve Awakening if they put their mind to it.
Admittedly, Buddhism as a religion has had a complicated history with respect to gender and equality, but like Star Trek, it strives to see the best in all of us.
After the desire for Buddhahood has been aroused, even wandering in the six worlds and the four forms of life becomes an opportunity to realize this desire. Though we may have wasted our time in the past, we still have time to arouse this vow. Our merits toward Buddhahood may have fully ripened, but let us concentrate this merit on enlightening all living beings. Through all ages some have put Buddhahood for themselves secondary to working for the benefit and salvation of all beings.
As with taking refuge in the Three Treasures from chapter two, small acts can have big impact in the long-run even if it’s not entirely clear. Simply awakening this aspiration even for this moment can help fully actualize one’s practice regardless of how wanders through various states of rebirth (chapter one).
In other words, compared to the aimless wandering that is Samsara one has a sense of direction now, regardless of where the path takes you.
Frodo didn’t know the way to Mordor, but he knew he needed to go there. 💍
To benefit others we have four types of wisdom: charity, tenderness, benevolence, and sympathy. These represent the desires and efforts of the Bodhisattvas.
This part is important. Buddhism isn’t just about “being wise” or “not doing bad stuff”, the ethical lifestyle that is the Buddhist path encourages certain traits that benefit others:
charity
tenderness
benevolence
sympathy
…these are explained in detail below. In some sources, these are known as the The Four Bases of Community. In any case, the Four Bases are grounded in Buddhist metta (goodwill).
Charity stands opposed to covetousness. It is the principle of not preventing offerings though we ourselves give nothing. We need not mind how small the gift so long as the results are true. Offering even a phrase or a verse of the teaching becomes the seed of good in this world and the next. Similarly goodness arises from the gift of one cent or a single blade of grass. The teaching is the treasure, and the treasure is the teaching. Let us not covet reward but share our power with others. Supplying a ferry and building a bridge are acts of charity — nor is industry in all its form separated from it.
Like it says, no gift is too small if sincerely given.
Tenderness means viewing all beings with compassion and addressing them with kind words. Tenderness is to speak while bearing in mind the words: “I love all living beings as my children.” Praise the virtuous and pity the virtueless. Through tenderness we make friends of our enemies and strengthen intimacy with our friends. Kind words, when spoken directly to anyone, brighten his face and warm his heart. When spoken behind his back, they leave a deep impression. We should learn that tenderness has a revolutionary impact on the human mind.
Kind or patient speech really is a powerful thing. You don’t need to kiss up to people. Just say “thank you” or “good job” or “hang in there”.
Benevolence means devising wise ways to benefit beings both high and low. Those who rescued the helpless tortoise or the sick sparrow did not look for reward: they acted solely out of benevolence. The foolish believe that their benefits dwindle because they help others, but this is not true. Benevolence, the universal law, benefits oneself as well as others.
The sentence about “dwindling benefits” is important. As we saw in chapter one, karma matters. As we saw with the Bodhisattva Precepts, it’s important not to be stingy.
Sympathy means non-differentiation — the identity of self and not-self. For example, the Tathagata [Buddha] appeared in the human world in human form. Sympathy refutes the distinction between self and others. Sometimes the self is infinite; sometimes, others. Sympathy, like the sea, repulses no water, and all waters gather to form the sea.
Putting yourself in another person’s shoes is one of the best things you can do. You don’t have to like the person, but if you can empathize with them, you will learn a lot.
The simile of the ocean is really powerful here.
Seekers of enlightenment, meditate on these teachings. Do not belittle them. Revere and respect the merits that benefit all living beings and help them cross to the other shore.
The image of the Other Shore is very prevalent in Buddhism, and describes a great river with two shores: one shore which we are standing on is the shore of grief, strife, frustration, etc., and the other shore is peace, well-being, goodwill and of course Enlightenment. Thus, the image of crossing toward the other shore (preferably helping others to do the same), is a popular one. It is also the impetus for the Japanese-Buddhist holidays of Spring and FallOhigan.
Having said that, tomorrow will be our last chapter. Thanks for reading!
P.S. If you ever wanted to see how the fourth chapter is traditionally chanted, please enjoy this video:
P.P.S. I have more LoTR memes on my phone camera roll than I care to admit. 😅
Today we explore the third chapter of five of the 19th-century Soto Zen text called the Shushōgi (修証義, “Meaning of Practice and Verification”), which I introduced here. Chapter three delves into the importance of conduct and the precepts. You can read chapter two here.
Next we should deeply respect the Three Treasures — the Buddha, the teaching, and the Buddhist community. They deserve our respect and offerings no matter where we wander from life to life. It was respect for the Buddha, the teaching, and the Buddhist community that was truly transmitted from India to China by the Buddhas and patriarchs.
Translation by Soto Zen Text Project of Stanford University, courtesy of sotozen.net
Westerners may find this a bit awkward. Why bow down and make offerings to a celestial being? Didn’t I leave my religious upbringing to avoid this kind of thing?
Buddhism is a religion that does not demand obedience or worship. People revere the Buddha because they appreciate his teachings, and find them helpful. They revere the Dharma because it is illuminating, and provides kind, objective guidance. People venerate the Sangha (the Buddhist community) because they are inspired by one teacher or another.
These Three Treasures (the Buddha, the Dharma and the Sangha) are the foundation of Buddhism.
If the unfortunate and virtueless cannot even hear of the Three Treasures, how can they take refuge in them. Do not take refuge in the spirits of the mountains or the ghosts of the dead, and worship not at heretical shrines. Such refuge-seeking leads us away from salvation. Let us instead quickly take refuge in the Buddha, the teaching, and the Buddhist community, seeking there not only release from pain but complete enlightenment.
This revisits something from chapter one: that human life is rare, and hearing the Dharma is even rarer, so it’s a precious opportunity.
Further, this passage warns us to be careful of messing around with occult stuff. It was written for a 19th-century Japanese audience from a 13th century source text, where syncretic folk religion and Shinto co-exist alongside Buddhism. But even now one can apply similar warnings toward mixing Buddhism with New Age practices and such. It might seem like a good idea, but better to thoroughly grasp the Dharma first before mixing with other stuff.
Again, this might feel weird to 21st century Buddhists, but in a much, much older text, the Sutra of the Simile of the Water Snake (MN22 of the Pali Canon), the Buddha described grasping the Dharma as similar to grasping a water snake (a.k.a. a viper): something to be done carefully. In modern parlance, one could also compare this to taking up a new exercise routine, a new diet, or a new sport: you should consult with a doctor first lest you risk injuring yourself, or making yourself miserable.
But I digress.
To take refuge in the Three Treasures we must come with pure heart. No matter when — whether at the time of the Buddha’s appearance in the world or after his disappearance — we repeat with clasped hands and bowed head: “I take refuge in the Buddha. I take refuge in the teaching. I take refuge in the Buddhist community.” I take refuge in the Buddha because he is our great teacher. I take refuge in the teaching because of its curative effect. I take refuge in the Buddhist community because here we find wisdom and warmth. To become followers of Buddhism, we must uphold the Three Treasures. We must lay this foundation before receiving the moral precepts.
This is pretty self-explanatory. A person can be a Buddhist (or reaffirm their faith), just as they are now, by taking refuge in the Three Treasures. In so doing, they have started on the Buddhist path and have nowhere to go but up. For most people, and most Buddhist services, this means reciting:
I go to the Buddha for refuge.
I go to the Dharma for refuge.
I go to the Sangha for refuge.
Simple as that. (mic drop)
The merit of the Triple Refuge will always ripen when a responsive communion takes place between the trainee and the Buddha. Those who experience this communion — whether deva, dwellers in hell, or animals — will take this refuge. The embodied merit increases through the various stages of existence and ultimately leads to highest right enlightenment. The Buddha himself confirmed the merit of the Triple Refuge as supremely valuable and inconceivably profound. All living beings should therefore take this refuge.
Same as above: simply taking refuge in the Three Treasures (sincerely) is a great act, and has many benefits in the long-run.
Next we should accept the three collective pure precepts — that embracing good behavior, that embracing good deeds, and that embracing all beings and saving them. We should then accept the 10 grave prohibitions. First, do not kill; second, do not steal; third, do not engage in improper sexual conduct; fourth, do not lie； fifth, do not deal in intoxicants； sixth, do not criticize others； seventh, do not praise self and slander others； eighth, do not be stingy with the dharma or property; ninth, do not give way to anger； and tenth, do not disparage the three treasures. The Buddhas have received and kept the Triple Refuge, the three collective pure precepts, and the 10 grave prohibitions.
The three “pure precepts” are general injunctions for any Buddhist:
Don’t do evil
Embrace good
Cleanse one’s mind.
The “ten grave prohibitions” above are just another way of saying the Ten Bodhisattva Precepts, which I covered here.
By accepting these precepts you will attain supreme enlightenment — the indestructible Buddhahood realized or to be realized by the Buddhas of the past, present, and future. Would any wise man reject this goal? To all living beings the Buddha has shown that when they accept the moral precepts, they attain Buddhahood — a rank equal to the Great Enlightened — and that they are truly the children of the Buddha.
People who first discover Buddhism may be put off. They wanted to learn how to meditate, not take up a bunch of rules, but two things to keep in mind:
First, the precepts above are training rules. As mentioned in chapter two, the rules are meant to be treated like rehearsing lines for a play. With diligence, time and effort you get better and better at it.
Second, an ethical lifestyle leads to many countless benefits, and makes a solid foundation for more advanced practices such as meditation, etc.
All the Buddhas dwell here and embrace everything in their infinite wisdom. All beings, when they make this their dwelling place, see no distinction between subject and object. When this happens, all things — whether earth, vegetation, fence post, brick or pebble — function as Buddhas. The resulting wind and fire, fanned by the profound influence of the Buddhas, drive us to intimate enlightenment. This is the merit of non-doing and non-striving — the awakening of the wisdom mind.
Remember from chapter two, that the difference between a Buddha and a mundane person is the degree of awakening. The Buddhas follow the precepts without fail because they all worked at it for countless lifetimes and eons, and through their conduct, and the awakening that helps arise from it, they see things differently than we do. But the message is: we can do the same. We just need to believe.
Tomorrow we’ll explore chapter four. If you made it this far, thanks for reading!
P.S. If you ever wanted to see how the third chapter is traditionally chanted, please enjoy this video:
Gleanings in Buddha-Fields 
.jpg){kind=link}
You must be logged in to post a comment.